- Broadcasters will have to 'alert' viewers to the use of product placement within any segment of a television show
- Tobacco, alcohol, gambling products / services, baby milk, and products with high sugar or fat content are banned from being featured (there are more prohibited products / services, but it's a long list!)
- Products cannot be given undue prominence, and must be editorially justified.
- Only four 'types' of broadcast can use product placement - films, entertainment shows, dramas, and sports shows.
- Broadcasters will be able to use product placement from February 28th onwards
So, without going into finite detail about every possible minutiae of the code, it's pretty easy for broadcasters to fall foul of the guidelines, but I have a feeling that many will embrace the changes with open arms, after all the reward is extra advertising revenue, which many channels (especially the BBC, who face cutbacks after not being allowed to raise the cost of the licence fee, as well as a post-Big Brother Channel 4) will gratefully receive.
I've always been somewhat interested in product placement, because of the close links to advertising and PR in terms of generating interest in a product or service. Its closer linked to PR because the targeted audience is almost oblivious to what products are being broadcast to them, instead focusing on the characters and action on the screen, whereas advertising is often seen in a negative regard - especially commercial breaks, where people stereotypically nip to the toilet, or stick the kettle on!
Product placement is mainly something associated with American television shows (next time you sit down and watch your favourite american cop drama see if you can spot logos or any sort of branding in the back of shot). The queen of product placement is arguably pop star Lady Gaga, who has been known to cleverly incorporate several products and services into the narrative of a music video, in order to generate increased awareness for the companies she associates herself with.
Watch the video for her 2010 hit single 'Telephone', which has nearly 35 million YouTube views below.
The PR challenge is now to raise awareness of the benefits of product placement to the companies they represent, and to promote the use of their products in the shows. In America product placement takes up around 5 percent of all money spent on advertising, but I suspect that once broadcasters and viewers become used to the idea, the figure will increase in the UK, purely because it will become the method of advertising de rigueur. The test will be if randomly sticking products into television shows can be a long-term money making success.
In a less serious note, heres a few product placement scenarios you WONT be watching soon:
- Eastenders' Phil Mitchell waving his GHD hair straighteners round in the Queen Vic
- X Factor contestant Mary Byrne (Tesco Mary) holding a Sainsburys carrier bag on stage
- Jeremy Kyle swigging from a 2 litre bottle of White Lightning
- An episode of Countdown using Birdseye's Alphabites
- Gary Lineker scoffing a packet of Walkers crisps during Match of the Day
Make sure you let me know who you are in the comments, so either sign up using a Google account (easy) or write your name in with the anonymous comment!
PRODUCT PLACEMENT BEGINS

PRODUCT PLACEMENT ENDS
Do you think product placement is the future of television advertising? Why?
How would you feel if your favourite TV show suddenly was full of product placement?
Let me know
Paul
Interesting reading...I didn't realise this was what the future holds for television. I have no further suggestions of 'funnies' though.
ReplyDeleteI think product placement is the most powerful and cleverest form of advertising. It’s so easy these days with most people owning playback devices which have the ability to live pause/fast forward, to skip through the commercial breaks. Therefore if products are seen throughout the programmes, people are somewhat obliged to be advertised to.
ReplyDeleteToo much product placement would be overkill and people would get pissed off because everything on TV would have a name to it. I love how on Eastenders, everyone drinks larger that has some random polish looking label on the can... clearly avoiding using brand leaders! It’s great when I see something I have being used to TV, especially if someone’s wearing the same clothes as me and like to tell everyone... look she’s wearing “my dress”... (Yes, lame I know...) It also works well the other way round, if you want someone and someone on TV has it, especially if they are a celebrity that you admire, their endorsement can sometimes make you want that product more.
These new rules are interesting but seem silly to me and way too extreme. Prohibited product Baby Milk... wtf? Since when has that caused offence!!
As for product placement that you wouldn’t see: Wayne Bridges reading John Terry’s autobiography on Soccer AM, Britney Spears holding any make of hairbrush and Bill Gates launching Windows 8 using a macbook pro?
if you want *something* and someone on TV has it... typpppoooo!
ReplyDelete